This article explores how factual manipulation in arbitral awards may constitute fraud and serve as grounds for annulment under Indonesia Arbitration Law, with reference to Supreme Court jurisprudence
This article examines the annulment of arbitral awards under Indonesia Arbitration Law, particularly in cases where an arbitration agreement is absent or invalid. It analyses court jurisprudence confirming that participation in arbitral proceedings does not constitute acceptance of an arbitration agreement lacking formal validity.
The article explores the issue of ultra petita in arbitration, analyzing how Indonesian jurisprudence interprets its use as a ground for annulment of arbitral awards under Indonesia Arbitration Law.
This article critically examines how arbitration tribunals in Indonesia determine and allocate arbitration costs. By reviewing jurisprudence and BANI procedural rules, it highlights the flexibility given to tribunals in regulating cost responsibilities beyond the provisions of the Arbitration and ADR Law.
While arbitral awards are final and binding, the District Court still holds limited authority to examine annulment petitions. This article explores how such authority must align with the non-intervention principle in arbitration, preserving the independence of arbitral jurisdiction.
Discussion on annulment of arbitral award, arbitration agreement validity, and jurisdictional issue in Indonesia.
This article examines the scope of Arbitral Award Annulment in Indonesia, analyzing Supreme Court decisions that shaped Arbitral Award Annulment Jurisprudence within the framework of Arbitration Jurisprudence Indonesia.
This article examines the legal remedies for appeal against arbitral award annulment in Indonesia, highlighting jurisprudence on arbitral award annulment without memorandum and the significance of an appeal memorandum.
This article examines whether an arbitral award in Indonesia can be corrected by the court, highlighting the distinction between correction and annulment.