This article examines the enforceability of non-compete clauses under Indonesian employment and contract law. It analyzes their legal basis, human rights implications, and judicial precedents.
This article examines the enforceability of non-compete clauses under Indonesian employment and contract law. It analyzes their legal basis, human rights implications, and judicial precedents.
This article examines how Indonesian jurisprudence handles the legal standing of customary law communities in administrative disputes.
This article discusses how Indonesian courts interpret the final element in KTUN and what it means for administrative decisions.
This article discusses how Indonesia enforces environmental supervision and administrative sanctions. It also explains the role of environmental approval in business and construction activities, and highlights legal uncertainty when such approval is not clearly required. The analysis reflects broader issues in Indonesia’s environmental law.
Examining how Indonesian environmental law and court jurisprudence support individuals’ legal standing in administrative environmental disputes, with a focus on landmark cases and regulatory developments.
Understanding how environmental organizations can file claims in Indonesia’s State Administrative Court is essential in addressing environmental disputes. This article discusses key laws, jurisprudence, and conditions for legal standing under the Environmental Law and Supreme Court regulations.
This article elaborates on the legal foundation and scope of discretion within Indonesian administrative law, highlighting how State Administrative Decisions (KTUN) are formulated and justified based on statutory authority.
This article analyzes how land certificates may qualify as State Administrative Decisions (KTUN), yet disputes involving land ownership may require prior civil court resolution.
The Indonesian Constitutional Court reviewed the 1999 Arbitration Law, particularly the definition of “international arbitral award.” It ruled to remove “considered,” which some viewed as adding legal uncertainty. However, the ruling didn’t address broader issues surrounding definitions and interpretations, leaving questions about clarity in international arbitration unresolved. A modernization of the law is needed.